ONE, TWO, THREE, and …

Several things have influenced big changes in my thinking during the past four years. They were huge revelations for me that shattered nearly everything I held dear for most of my life. Upon further reflection, whatever I had held so dear in the past was really based on the unquestioned beliefs of my teachers rather than a personal conviction based on my own study and deliberation on all available historical and archeological data. (Unfortunately, I grew up long before Al Gore had invented the Internet. Ha!) Actually, what started me on this course were a couple of presentations that asked some very poignant questions about the legacy of my Lutheran heritage. This was about 35+ years ago, when my friend from Australia, Robert Brinsmead, toured Florida. Those questions continued to nag my consciousness and led to even more questions on what I really believed and practiced, and why.

One

My first major discovery not only nudged me away from Protestant Lutheranism but also into the uncharted waters of questioning the very core of Christianity itself. Briefly, I discovered the unconditional love and forgiving acceptance that the Creator has for all humanity. (I have always loved you and will always love you, no matter what; and I will never leave you or forsake you.) Those implied affirmations grew to become the basis of a personal conviction while reflecting on the ordered nature surrounding us, my life and breath, and the many gracious experiences I have encountered which involved very compassionate human beings, both religious and nonreligious. These stand opposed to the violent “god” of the scriptures and the scripture myths and legends taught by the Church. Briefly, unconditional love, without payment of any kind, challenges the Church’s theory of salvation, including its proposed savior. To put it bluntly, their claim that Jesus’ perfect life and gruesome bloody payment on the cross was offered up for humanity’s disobedience and affords ample satisfaction for their violent god’s anger for such disobedience is nothing but a fabrication based on a sick mindset and on incredible misunderstandings! It betrays their own sick conclusion of what “justice” really is, and it betrays their sick configuration of a “god” as well. These two erroneous conclusions are not all that different from the ancient shaman’s conclusions, who tried to explain the source of the natural catastrophes around them which he surmised would require human sacrifices to stop such punishing “acts of god.” That their sacrifices did not seem to appease that anger indicated continued re-enactments of still more sacrificing. I write in greater detail of my findings concerning these gross misunderstandings taught by the Church, and, unfortunately, accepted as truth by many, in the last August post of my blog at http://www.infoguyhank.wordpress.com You will want to detour to this site later to find a more detailed view, based on archeological and historical evidence, discoveries which confronted my belief-system and encouraged my consciousness to make statements such as those above, statements which the Church is bound to label as heresy. So be it! At least they are not allowed to burn me at the stake any more.

Two

The second discovery to jolt my personal belief system are the various collections of sayings of the historical Jesus, the Galilean sage, originally passed on orally between illiterate followers, but later recorded by scribes into Greek and Aramaic manuscripts. Only a few have been found. One German scholar divided them into three distinct groups and called them “The Source.” The final two groups were added to the first sayings as historical events progressed. When Jesus did not return as soon as was expected, the followers tended to include apocalyptic references which they consequently attributed to Jesus. Such references were generally well known in Judaism ever since their return from Persia. After Jerusalem was destroyed, other followers added a third group of sayings which indicated an angry threatening tone toward those who would not listen to them. Many of these sayings found their way into the gospels where the writers used them together with the hearsay stories of Jesus’ brief ministry to build their narratives. Many collections which included these sayings as well were found in manuscripts that were later banned by the Church. The writer, John, not the disciple, had another agenda and refused to recognize their value since they contained nothing about Jesus’ life. It was this contrived life found in the gospels, and what it was interpreted to mean by my teachers and their teachers for centuries, that had hidden the real meaning of these sayings for me. Not that I can attest for the authenticity of them all; however, several certainly do relate to Jesus’ main message of the “kingdom” being present among and in us while revealing the unconditional love of the Father yearning to be discovered and utilized by us. Some of the manuscripts, also interesting for the same reasons, were hidden by Egyptian monks, apparently unwilling to obey the Church’s ban. And unfortunately, most original manuscripts were destroyed when the Church ordered the burning of the Library at Alexandria, which, they claimed, housed too many “heretical” manuscripts.

Many sayings and several manuscripts were found in 1945, hidden in clay jars along the Upper Nile. It turns out that some of these sayings had been used by the first gospel writer, Mark, after 70 A.D., following the destruction of Jerusalem, the Temple, and the killing and dispersing of the Jews throughout Europe, the Far East, and North Africa. During the next generation, since Matthew and Luke used much of Mark’s narrative content while adding their own views, such as the virgin birth, the resurrection, and the second coming, many sayings can be found in their narratives as well. It is interesting that the first group of sayings mention absolutely nothing of an apocalyptic return to judge the world and destroy Jesus’ enemies in a fiery hell. This is probably the main reason why the gospel writer John, again, not the disciple, more than two generations after Jesus’ death, refused to give them much credence. If he was the same John who wrote later in the Book of Revelation, his mindset, like Paul’s, but nearly five decades later, was obviously tainted with the apocalyptic ideas of Judaism as well, which, as I wrote, had been learned in Persia centuries before. Another possible reason is because the first and a few of the second group of sayings only speak of the Father’s generous love for and acceptance of all his children, even his enemies. They speak of serving others, not ruling over them, much less destroying any of them.

These collections, together with the OT prophet’s promises of better times ahead as more and more folks catch this spirit of loving compassion, especially for those who are oppressed by political and religious tyranny or are in dire need, like widows and orphans, caught and held my attention. Both the pre-Babylonian-captivity prophets and Jesus as well register their complaints against the religious establishment that still called for sacrifices, although no longer for human sacrifices, and for keeping the Sabbath, etc. in order to escape their humane responsibilities, that is, placing service to their “god” ahead of service to their neighbor. This is why these sayings have given me a new comforting view of the Creator’s real grace and mercy toward his prodigal children, including myself. And it certainly has nothing to do with a bloody human sacrifice to pay for humanity’s disobedience! Rather, it has everything to do with an eternal unconditional love that is the Source of all good and beautiful things seen around us and seen expressed in the compassionate kindnesses of humanity, no matter their religion or lack of it – anything that encourages individuals and helps to relieve oppressive situations others are experiencing. Unconditional love, forgiveness and acceptance, IS the mark of a Higher restorative justice that can finally bring permanent relief to both sides involved in a nasty situation caused by one or the other. However, forgiveness and acceptance that depends upon payment, especially a bloody violent one, for disobedience is actually not forgiveness at all, and it certainly is not loving. In fact, it is unjust because it brings little or no permanent relief and only carries with it the big IF you believe in the payment! Therefore, it brings little, if any, change in behavior. Rather, it encourages us to demand the same type of unjust violent punishment for wrong-doing. And the only thing permanent about a forgiveness paid for in blood is repeated fear, fear, fear, confessions, confessions, confessions, and mediated reassurances, reassurances, reassurance, and nagging doubt, doubt, doubt..

Three

Third, a good friend recommended that I read Constantine’s Sword by James Carroll. This book, written by a one-time Roman Catholic priest, documents the history of the Church and its violent treatment of the Jews from the very beginnings of Christianity to WWII and beyond.

Carroll was the son of the Chief of Staff, Gen. Joseph Carroll, U.S. Air Force, Wiesbaden, Germany, during the late 1950’s and was later assigned to the Pentagon in the early 1960’s. He was the General who hand-carried photo proof of the Russian missile buildup in Cuba to JFK. To the complete embarrassment of his father, James became a dissenter over the Vietnam War and later a RC priest.

As a priest, he began to study why the huge cross, erected at Auschwitz by the RC Church and then named the new “Golgotha,” was so offensive to the Jews. His discoveries were astounding and soon led him to leave the priesthood, marry, and become a writer.

Carroll found a) that the gruesome execution on a cross had been used by the Romans mostly for punishing the many Jewish “messiah” figures and their rebel followers, not just for the usual criminals, for nearly 200 years, and it was not unusual to see scores of bodies hanging on crosses outside Jerusalem, and b) that Saul of Tarsus (the Apostle Paul), Doctor of Apocryphal Law, laws found in Judaism after the Babylonian Captivity and in the state religion of Persia, was looking for the fulfillment of the Apocalypse and believed he had found its promised messiah in Jesus and in his death on the cross as the promised savior, (Remember that Tarsus was the center of Persian Mithraism. Do your own study of Mithras and you will find striking similarities to Paul’s “Christ/Messiah.”), and c) that two and three generations after Jesus’ death, well after the Romans had destroyed the Temple and Jerusalem, killing and dispersing thousands of Jews, the gospel writers simply added to Paul’s speculations, found in his letters written about 50 A.D., and made their own claims of Jesus’ virgin birth, his resurrection, his being the eternal Son of God, and his very soon return to judge mankind and destroy his enemies, and worse, d) the writers more than hinted that it was the Jews who had killed their Lord. (What else would you expect them to write? That the Romans had killed him?) Early Jewish followers, like James and Peter had either been executed or had died by now, and other Jews had been killed or dispersed throughout Europe and elsewhere by then. Survival for early Gentile Christians during the first 200 years was difficult enough to say the least. Nero had blamed them for Rome’s big fire, they were used as targets in Rome’s games, and used as slaves in Roman mines. Jews seemed to be excellent scapegoats to finally get Rome’s eyes off the Christians, particularly since they were assumed to be god-killers according to the gospel account copies.

This concept became well-seated among Christians after Constantine supposedly had his vision of the cross with the message, “in this sign, you conquer,” (IHSV and the cross soon replaced the Roman eagle). His army won the battle for Rome and he became both a Christian and the Roman Emperor over York, Europe, Italy, and all the Eastern part of the Empire, including North Africa. He built his new Christian capital at Constantinople. His conversion was a political decision made to unite the empire. It included ending Christian persecutions, setting them free from Rome’s slave mines, and from being used as targets for sport at the Roman games. Recognizing the many divisions among Christians, he called a Council of differing bishops from throughout the Empire at Nicaea where he proposed acceptance of a unifying creed and at least the four better recognized gospels as the holy word of their god to unite around and to teach universally among the churches. Since it had been common practice for scribes to add to and/or change the contents of the copies they worked with to fit their own agendas/beliefs, original documents were no longer in existence. More letters and copied manuscripts would be added to the NT by other Councils during the following years. And they were made to fit their new creeds, especially when Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria, laid the groundwork for the doctrine of the Triune God.

After 325 A.D., instead of the fish, the cross became the symbol of Christianity, and also the excuse behind war and violence (Crusades, Spanish Inquisition, etc.) where Jews, not just pagans and other “unbelievers,” always seemed to suffer most of the atrocities. Still, the Church, even the Protestant leaders, including Luther, continued to blame the Jews for killing their Lord. With the exception of only a handful of Popes who offered Jews protection in a ghetto, most of the Popes usually backed the emperors and monarchs for political and financial reasons. Their primary goal was the eradication of the Jews. Even the horrible catastrophe for Jews during WWII in the concentration camp gas chambers and ovens of Germany, Russia, and Poland had roots some years earlier when the RC Church backed the Third Reich and Hitler for financial reasons, hoping he could hold back the Communist Bolsheviks from invading Europe and taking over Church property. When the Nazi storm troopers came to collect Jews from Rome’s ghetto, the Church remained officially silent.

(Again, it must be said that the Nazis also gathered up other “unbelievers,” including unsupportive Protestants and Catholics, and Orthodox Christians as well. All were taken to the camps to be disposed of. Some now place that total at twelve million, in addition to the six million Jews, eighteen million in all. Very meticulous name lists were kept by the Nazis, and most have now been found. This behavior was not unlike what the Phoenicians did with their burned human sacrifices to Baal/Moloch – a curious similarity, actually a man-made hell for those so sacrified.)

Carroll has gathered and documented more church history than I had ever been aware of. My better understanding of this history has obviously influenced my current thinking, and my former respect for the Church has been called into question, as has my former respect for the Bible. Now I see them for what they really are – unholy! The former is nothing but a religious establishment with the assumed power to rule over the minds of millions through their oppressive doctrines. And the latter is nothing but the literature of sick writers whose mindsets are based on payback punishment and legend. This is not to say that there are no loving church members who show evidence of their unconditional compassion for others in need, a compassion in spite of what their church demands of them, nor does it say that some truth cannot be found hidden among all the well-established weeds in the scriptures. All this has given new meaning to Jesus’ words, “Father, forgive them. They do not know what they are doing.” Read this book and you will never again hang a cross around your neck or wear it on your lapel!

There are other questions still unanswered.  What other long-held “truths” generally held by mankind will crumble next? Perhaps some related to the respected sciences, like earth science or medicine maybe? Will the supposed Mayan predictions for December 21 fizzle like other apocalyptic-like predictions always have? Or perhaps their prediction that certain political and religious folks hope for was not apocalyptic after all? Were they predicting (hoping for) the end of an age where the punishing mindset of “us vs. them” will finally be overcome with more love and compassion for each other?  Then, I wonder what influence politics and finances have over the sciences. Are simple, natural, and better discoveries being held back because they cannot be reproduced in a lab for a patent? When will whistle blowers have the courage to speak up about known deceptions and cover-ups? We all have so much to learn, so much to search out, so many teachers to question. Good hunting. Life is a never-ending curiosity! For all our advances over millennia, sometimes I think we have merely begun to scratch the surface.

Henry (Hank) Hasse ~ 9/15/12

Published in: on September 14, 2012 at 2:45 pm  Leave a Comment  
SYNERGY

Discovering Flashes of Unconditional Love Among Us

Irenic Publications

Discovering Flashes of Unconditional Love Among Us

The Unconditional Human Spirit

Discovering Flashes of Unconditional Love Among Us

Great New Story

Discovering Flashes of Unconditional Love Among Us

WordPress.com

WordPress.com is the best place for your personal blog or business site.